<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Corporealshift &#187; Web Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://corporealshift.com/category/web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://corporealshift.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 03:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I Love Opera!</title>
		<link>http://corporealshift.com/2009/04/04/i-love-opera/</link>
		<comments>http://corporealshift.com/2009/04/04/i-love-opera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Diedrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corporealshift.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people are familiar with the browser Opera, but how many people really use it?  In general it is overlooked for more common browsers such as Firefox or Internet Explorer.  You may recall that I recently purchased a Dell mini netbook, and of course I was using Firefox.  However, it became sluggish and problematic with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://corporealshift.com/2009/04/04/i-love-opera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Flash: Alternative to W3 Standards Compliance</title>
		<link>http://corporealshift.com/2008/11/12/adobe-flash-alternative-to-w3-standards-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://corporealshift.com/2008/11/12/adobe-flash-alternative-to-w3-standards-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Diedrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corporealshift.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe Flash is a great web design tool. One of the big benefits of Flash is the ability to produce content that works on any browser, as long as the user has the free Adobe Flash Player. It also allows for a great video streaming platform as well as much more functionality than HTML on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://corporealshift.com/2008/11/12/adobe-flash-alternative-to-w3-standards-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designing for the Mobile &#8216;Net: 3 Quick Steps to Better Looking, Faster Mobile Designs</title>
		<link>http://corporealshift.com/2008/10/18/designing-for-the-mobile-net-3-quick-steps-to-better-looking-faster-mobile-designs/</link>
		<comments>http://corporealshift.com/2008/10/18/designing-for-the-mobile-net-3-quick-steps-to-better-looking-faster-mobile-designs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Diedrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corporealshift.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the increased popularity of smart phones that feature wi-fi and 3G network capabilities, it&#8217;s becoming more important to design for these devices. Most of them have screen resolutions similar to the iPhone, which is 320&#215;240 pixels. That makes for a lot of pixels crammed into those 3-3.5 inch screens, and the way they handle [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://corporealshift.com/2008/10/18/designing-for-the-mobile-net-3-quick-steps-to-better-looking-faster-mobile-designs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
